The argument AGAINST voting for “ordinary folks”

Posted on: September 14, 2008

Just when I make a point saying voting for ordinary folks seems to be what people want, I find an article (American article) that says voting for ordinary people as your only criteria is just plain dumb.

Written  by a screenwriter named Micheal Seitzman, it is really a perfect blog post in that it is a hard-hitting personal attack, is holier than thou, takes liberties with proper English, uses one-word CAPITAL letters, and includes a pinch of teaser sex. Good enough to make HuffPo, here’s the link to Sarah Palin Naked, a commentary on her  interview with American Broadcasting Corporation’s Charles Gibson. The Palin performance appears to have scared the living beJeezuz out of Seitzman.


2 Responses to "The argument AGAINST voting for “ordinary folks”"

You all have to check out http://www.MILFandMcCain.com It is fantastically funny!

oh well ordinary folks shouldn’t be in control of the worlds most powerful nuclear arsenal. that’s the job for extraordinary folks, in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


  • None
  • wordbeeps: No, he doesn't deserve an apology. Who tweets during a funeral? If you do, expect feedback. I didn't say the mourners were faking it. I think they we
  • Holly Stick: Look you fuckwit, are you too stupid to realise that Ghomeshi was an actual friend of Layton's, when you tweeted to him that the mourners were faking
  • aardvarkcola: Thank you. I see the rest of your message now. i'm honoured to to have your words on my blog. That alone is a delight. Lawrence


%d bloggers like this: